Knowledgeable people have said that democracy means constant
vigilance. In this vigilance there seems to be some lack. Far from the state
elections when the media and the opposition were busy discussing the daily
routine of the Yogi Adityanath in Uttar Pradesh and the due diligence of the
SP, the BSP and the Congress leadership, the central government, after
discussions on the speech of the Finance Minister, had many controversial After
getting the full benefit of the majority in the Lok Sabha, a money bill with
provisions has passed quick and easy. In this way without sending to the Rajya
Sabha and without controversy, many controversial proposals, which have
influenced the lives of the people of the country, were made binding laws.
The clever Susan Finance Minister had argued that under Section 388, these subjects have a financial dimension. Therefore, the proposed amendments can be passed only in the Lok Sabha under the money bill. It is not necessary to send it for consideration of Rajya Sabha where there is a majority of the opposition. According to Trinamool Congress MP Saugat Rai, it is unprecedented in parliamentary history, not only in the Lok Sabha but in the 150 new provisions introduced in the draft of this complex bill, as suddenly 33 new but important provisions were added without any prior notice. The MPs did not have the time to read and understand this proposal with complex and technical but comprehensive fundamental changes, and the bill was passed without any meaningful debate or explanation. Due to weakness of the number, the resistance of the opposition has also proved to be the image of the temple. Meghnad, assistant to Biju Janata Dal MP Tathagat Satpathy, told tweet that perhaps under a thoughtful strategy, everyone was given the opportunity to speak before the Union Budget and before the MP could understand something, on this draft bill draft board Which was full of contradictions. For instance, making the Aadhar card mandatory for all children, old and young people. When the BJP was in opposition, in 2010, the parliamentary committee, led by its senior MP Yashwant Sinha, dismissed the proposal of UPA's 'Aadhar card scheme' and described it as a vague directionless and forceful step. He also said that it will also damage the right of citizens' privacy. Modi himself also termed it as a tactic in April 2014. Now why is the same basis being made so compulsive that without it the public will not be able to pay income tax, or will the primary class students get mid day meals? Even the Supreme Court has said that the mandatory requirement of the fund for the welfare schemes is not necessary. The clapping of democracy is played by both hands. Therefore, public or the opposition can not become an alternative to information based on political fatw or solid concrete authenticity. The Right to Information Act was obtained after obtaining information suppressed under governmental confidentiality after a long trial. On the other hand, it is also ironic that in the private life of the citizens, the 'Aadhar card wants to have every kind of intimacy through the information, itself, under a justified Right to Information Act, the facts behind the big decision like the ban on public Regardless of any desired information, it is getting worse. One, proposal for restructuring of existing monitoring cell under the Constitution is also worrisome. According to section 32, these cells hear the public against any tyranny of the Income Tax Department and changes can be brought only when there is a great danger before national security of the country. At least for the moment there is no such sunshine. Then, suddenly, the offer of the ability to make new appointments without pure government decisions is beyond comprehension, without the advice of the legislature like in the restructuring of the new cell and in the new cell. Anxiety is more profound when the experts point out that the governmental authorities have increased the scope of raiding and investigation in the house without prior notice. The same proverb will not be so true that 'Jarra will kill and will not even cry.' Now the proposed amendments, a possible dent in civilian citizenship. According to the Constitution, the right to share self-thinking, sharing the intimacy with others, making important decisions about political opinion, not only the lives of self and self-eating, eating habits, livelihood or life, but also in the Constitution. Like the freedom that is the foundation of democracy. A few years ago, Modi had also convinced us by giving a slogan "Minimum Government, Maximum Governance" that the minimum intervention of his government in life and maximum attention will be better governed. Then, in the civilian state of the citizen, when depositing the details of the Aadhaar card, then by linking the bank account pan and sometimes living in the park or roads, raising a young man from anti-Romeo squads or screaming beef-beef at a meat shop. Why is such an unpleasant racket getting hit? The second big area of doubt is linked to private parties by donating money to political parties. In the last few days, the citizens were told repeatedly to reduce the burden of the shortcomings during the note-taking that now the electoral black money of all parties has become soils and the remaining black money marketers will be forced to come into the banks. The elections will be clean and the relief money will be sent to the farmers, especially the farmers who are hit by drought, relief, debt waiver and direct bank accounts. No substantial information has been found so far about how much black money has emerged. At the same time, the government says farmers' debt waiver will ease the banking system, hence, their approval. At the same time, the government says farmers' debt waiver will ease the banking system, so it is not possible to decide on this without their consent. At the same time not only the pan for the subsidy, but also the Aadhar card will also be mandatory. While there are cases of privatization of the common people, the new legislation has given the green signal of the provision of strange bonds of electoral bonds. Through this, the industrialists can go 'donate' by buying an income-free bond of their desired amount, even without anonymity. There will be no obligation to tell the names of these secret donors. Now, companies can give up to 50 percent of the profits registered in income tax accounts without giving it to the government. It has been told that it will be used in infrastructure reforms. Not surprisingly, the experienced people are looking at countless proof of the smooth procurement of government and producer companies in the exchange of contracts for the last few years. Now the budget session is on and the MPs have yet to get the final information about the approved amendments to the Finance Bill. In such a situation, how much do we expect that when the wealthy government of words will give the right answer to these questions to the public and its representatives?
 |
| Parliament of India |
The clever Susan Finance Minister had argued that under Section 388, these subjects have a financial dimension. Therefore, the proposed amendments can be passed only in the Lok Sabha under the money bill. It is not necessary to send it for consideration of Rajya Sabha where there is a majority of the opposition. According to Trinamool Congress MP Saugat Rai, it is unprecedented in parliamentary history, not only in the Lok Sabha but in the 150 new provisions introduced in the draft of this complex bill, as suddenly 33 new but important provisions were added without any prior notice. The MPs did not have the time to read and understand this proposal with complex and technical but comprehensive fundamental changes, and the bill was passed without any meaningful debate or explanation. Due to weakness of the number, the resistance of the opposition has also proved to be the image of the temple. Meghnad, assistant to Biju Janata Dal MP Tathagat Satpathy, told tweet that perhaps under a thoughtful strategy, everyone was given the opportunity to speak before the Union Budget and before the MP could understand something, on this draft bill draft board Which was full of contradictions. For instance, making the Aadhar card mandatory for all children, old and young people. When the BJP was in opposition, in 2010, the parliamentary committee, led by its senior MP Yashwant Sinha, dismissed the proposal of UPA's 'Aadhar card scheme' and described it as a vague directionless and forceful step. He also said that it will also damage the right of citizens' privacy. Modi himself also termed it as a tactic in April 2014. Now why is the same basis being made so compulsive that without it the public will not be able to pay income tax, or will the primary class students get mid day meals? Even the Supreme Court has said that the mandatory requirement of the fund for the welfare schemes is not necessary. The clapping of democracy is played by both hands. Therefore, public or the opposition can not become an alternative to information based on political fatw or solid concrete authenticity. The Right to Information Act was obtained after obtaining information suppressed under governmental confidentiality after a long trial. On the other hand, it is also ironic that in the private life of the citizens, the 'Aadhar card wants to have every kind of intimacy through the information, itself, under a justified Right to Information Act, the facts behind the big decision like the ban on public Regardless of any desired information, it is getting worse. One, proposal for restructuring of existing monitoring cell under the Constitution is also worrisome. According to section 32, these cells hear the public against any tyranny of the Income Tax Department and changes can be brought only when there is a great danger before national security of the country. At least for the moment there is no such sunshine. Then, suddenly, the offer of the ability to make new appointments without pure government decisions is beyond comprehension, without the advice of the legislature like in the restructuring of the new cell and in the new cell. Anxiety is more profound when the experts point out that the governmental authorities have increased the scope of raiding and investigation in the house without prior notice. The same proverb will not be so true that 'Jarra will kill and will not even cry.' Now the proposed amendments, a possible dent in civilian citizenship. According to the Constitution, the right to share self-thinking, sharing the intimacy with others, making important decisions about political opinion, not only the lives of self and self-eating, eating habits, livelihood or life, but also in the Constitution. Like the freedom that is the foundation of democracy. A few years ago, Modi had also convinced us by giving a slogan "Minimum Government, Maximum Governance" that the minimum intervention of his government in life and maximum attention will be better governed. Then, in the civilian state of the citizen, when depositing the details of the Aadhaar card, then by linking the bank account pan and sometimes living in the park or roads, raising a young man from anti-Romeo squads or screaming beef-beef at a meat shop. Why is such an unpleasant racket getting hit? The second big area of doubt is linked to private parties by donating money to political parties. In the last few days, the citizens were told repeatedly to reduce the burden of the shortcomings during the note-taking that now the electoral black money of all parties has become soils and the remaining black money marketers will be forced to come into the banks. The elections will be clean and the relief money will be sent to the farmers, especially the farmers who are hit by drought, relief, debt waiver and direct bank accounts. No substantial information has been found so far about how much black money has emerged. At the same time, the government says farmers' debt waiver will ease the banking system, hence, their approval. At the same time, the government says farmers' debt waiver will ease the banking system, so it is not possible to decide on this without their consent. At the same time not only the pan for the subsidy, but also the Aadhar card will also be mandatory. While there are cases of privatization of the common people, the new legislation has given the green signal of the provision of strange bonds of electoral bonds. Through this, the industrialists can go 'donate' by buying an income-free bond of their desired amount, even without anonymity. There will be no obligation to tell the names of these secret donors. Now, companies can give up to 50 percent of the profits registered in income tax accounts without giving it to the government. It has been told that it will be used in infrastructure reforms. Not surprisingly, the experienced people are looking at countless proof of the smooth procurement of government and producer companies in the exchange of contracts for the last few years. Now the budget session is on and the MPs have yet to get the final information about the approved amendments to the Finance Bill. In such a situation, how much do we expect that when the wealthy government of words will give the right answer to these questions to the public and its representatives?
Comments
Post a Comment